<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Fashion Cult &#187; sacrilege</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefashioncult.com/tag/sacrilege/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefashioncult.com</link>
	<description>Culture Criticism Through a Fashion Lense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>If It Wasn&#8217;t Chanel Would You Still Love it? PFW Spring 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.thefashioncult.com/2009/10/if-it-wasnt-chanel-would-you-still-love-it-pfw-spring-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefashioncult.com/2009/10/if-it-wasnt-chanel-would-you-still-love-it-pfw-spring-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Fashion Cult]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Runway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chanel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sacrilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My guess is hell no. The hobby lobby mess you see above, folks, was produced by none other than the legendary fashion house of Chanel (a la Karl Lagerfeld). And what I&#8217;m about to say may be fashion sacrilege to some, but it&#8217;s true: these clothes are garbage. Granted, I chose some of the most [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3485/3987771734_e34c5368a0_o.jpg" width="643" height="480" alt="chanel hobby lobby spring 2010" class="aligncenter"/></p>
<p>My guess is <em>hell</em> no.</p>
<p>The hobby lobby mess you see above, folks, was produced by none other than the legendary fashion house of Chanel (a la <a href="/?s=karl+lagerfeld">Karl Lagerfeld</a>). And what I&#8217;m about to say may be fashion sacrilege to some, but it&#8217;s true: these clothes are garbage. Granted, I chose some of the most hideous from the Spring 2010 collection to make my point, but it&#8217;s still valid. These clothes are not forward, or trendy, and not even classic! </p>
<p>While I genuinely admire the contributions Coco Chanel made to fashion, and can appreciate how revolutionary she was, I just cannot abide label worship. There <em>must</em> be other fashionphiles out there that feel this way. So why do I feel like panning Chanel is like taking the Lord&#8217;s name in vain. *<strong>taboo</strong>*</p>
<p>See below for a few looks that somewhat struck my fancy (click for larger view). Six out of 72 = FAIL.<br />
<a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/palatable-chanel-spring-2010.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/palatable-chanel-spring-2010.jpg" alt="palatable chanel spring 2010" title="palatable chanel spring 2010" width="800"class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4990" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefashioncult.com/2009/10/if-it-wasnt-chanel-would-you-still-love-it-pfw-spring-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
